Here's the story in more detail.
Leistungsbeurteilungen(von der
Publikation „Informationen für die Professorinnen / Professoren und
Lehrbeauftragten des FBI", Stand WS 1999 / 2000): Für alle Studiengänge gelten nach der neuen RPO II die folgenden Leistungsbeurteilungen
|
sehr gut |
1,0 / 1,3 |
|
gut |
1,7 / 2,0 / 2,3 |
|
befriedigend |
2,7 / 3,0 /3,3 |
|
ausreichend |
3,7 / 4,0 |
|
nicht ausreichend |
5.0 |
Diese Leistungsbeurteilungen gelten auch für Service-Lehrveranstaltungen und die
allgemeinwissenschaftlichen Ergänzungsfächer.
Here's a sample calculation for
the student "Alfred E. Neumann".

|
cover letter and c.v. (20% each) |
Score: 85 + 80
= 17 + 16
points |
|
interview questions (5% each) |
75 + 80 + 80 = 235 ÷ 3 = 78.3 x .15 =
11.7 points |
presentation
(see assessment criteria below) |
29
out of 35
=
29 points |
|
participation |
70 x .10 = 7
points
|
|
Total |
80.7 = 2,3 |
|
Here's how the grades "are translated" into the BHT system.
Final Grades
|
96%-100% |
=
1,0 |
|
90%-95% |
= 1,3 |
|
87%-89% |
= 1,7 |
|
83%-86% |
= 2,0 |
|
80%-82% |
= 2,3 |
|
77%-79% |
= 2,7 |
|
73%-76% |
= 3,0 |
|
70%-72% |
= 3,3 |
|
67%-69% |
= 3,7 |
|
65%-66% |
= 4,0 |
|
0-64% |
= 5,0 |
Decimal results are rounded as follows:
x,6 - x,9 (e.g. 74,7) = 75
x,1 - x,5 (e.g. 74,5) = 74
Here's some other important
information.
(a) An email from FB1 Dekan, Prof. Dr. Kurt Bangert from 26 Sep 2012
says

(b) Laut RSPO, hiermit ist der Prüfungsversuch
begonnen worden. Ein Rücktritt von der Prüfungsanmeldung (Belegung) ist
jetzt nicht mehr möglich.
(c) If you miss the test, you can
make it up at the end of the semester.
(2. Prüfungsangebot).
(d) If you don't do all the written homework tasks, you won't get a grade.
(e) You don't have to come to
every class, but I hope / believe the class work will help you learn
English, which - after all - is what this whole thing is all about.
Therefore, if you miss more than three
classes without a doctor's excuse, you won't get a grade.
(f)
If you don't understand
any of this, please ask me.
(g)
If
you don't understand AND you don't ask, good luck.
Assessment of Presentation
|
Pronunciation Mistakes* |
>10 |
5 – 10 |
<5 |
|
Points |
6 |
8 |
10 |
|
Structure /
Grammar Mistakes |
>10 |
5 – 10 |
<5 |
|
Points |
6 |
8 |
10 |
|
Read from notes |
Usually |
Rarely |
Never |
|
Points |
6 |
8 |
10 |
|
Visuals ≈ Text |
Same |
Similar |
Different |
|
Points |
2 |
3 |
5 |
|
* Some (but not all) definitions of "pronunciation
mistakes"
(1) I had to stop the video and listen again because I wasn't able to
understand what you said for
other than "technical" reasons. A "technical reason" means there was a problem
with the video.
(2) Incorrect pronunciation of the English "th sounds" (think
vs. this).
Every time it occurs is one mistake.
(3) "Mixing" English sounds. Every time it occurs it's one mistake.
e.g.
"s" and "z" (loose
vs. lose)
"j" and "ch" (jeep
vs. cheap)
"sh" and "ch" (ship
vs. chip)
"sh" and "zh" (pressure
vs. pleasure)
"f" and "v" (have
vs. half)
"v" and "w" (veil
vs. whale)
etc.
|